FULL VS. LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION
Full Representation
Full representation is the traditional attorney-client relationship. The attorney handles all matters of the case, including but not limited to, drafting and filing of pleadings, correspondence, negotiation, and attendance at hearings and settlement conferences. Full representation is the most common type of representation because it ensures that an experienced attorney is with you throughout every step of your case. Full representation is likely the best option if you cannot agree on a division of marital assets, you cannot agree on a parenting schedule, or if the amount of your marital assets and/or debts is large.
Limited Scope Representation
Limited scope representation is another type of attorney-client relationship. With limited scope representation, the attorney and the client agree to divide the various tasks of the case. The attorney will only assist with those services that she has agreed to provide, and the client will be responsible for all other aspects of the case. Limited scope representation is typically less expensive than full representation and it gives the client the ability to pay for individual services throughout the pending court case rather than pay a large retainer at the beginning of the case. However, limited scope representation isn’t appropriate in all matters or for all parties. There are benefits and risks when representing yourself in a family court matter. You need to be open and honest about your case so that the attorney can accurately assess your case and determine if limited scope representation is right for you.